Comparison of sensory attributes and chemical markers of the infrared spectrum between defective and non-defective Colombian coffee samples

Authors

  • Yeison Fernando Barrios Rodriguez Universidad Surcolombiana/USCO, Facultad de Ingeniería agrícola, Centro Surcolombiano de Investigación en Café/CESURCAFÉ, Avenida Pastrana Borrero, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-8773
  • Karen Tatiana Salas Calderon Universidad Surcolombiana/USCO, Facultad de Ingeniería agrícola, Centro Surcolombiano de Investigación en Café/CESURCAFÉ, Avenida Pastrana Borrero, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-8151
  • Joel Giron Hernandez Universidad Surcolombiana/USCO, Facultad de Ingeniería agrícola, Centro Surcolombiano de Investigación en Café/CESURCAFÉ, Avenida Pastrana Borrero, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-4475

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25186/.v15i.1659

Keywords:

Bean defects, FTIR-ATR, principal component analysis, quality coffee.

Abstract

Defects in coffee affect the sensory quality of finished drink. To avoid this, defective beans are usually removed after threshing, as, once the green beans have been roasted, it becomes difficult to identify the defects. Procedures have been developed to evaluate coffee samples using infrared spectroscopy to detect such defects. As such, this study evaluated infrared spectra and sensory attributes of 39 coffee samples in: commercial ground and instant coffees, medium and high roast quality coffees, and defects present in the coffee. The sensory analysis was performed by 10 judges, semi-trained by a Q-grader, and eleven attributes were assessed using a semi-structured hedonic scale. The spectra obtained from the coffee samples were processed by area normalization, first derivative, and second derivative, later followed by principle component analyses. The sensory results showed differences in the evaluated attributes, differentiating between the samples of high quality medium roast coffee from the other samples. Principal component analysis applied to IR spectra showed that when normalizing the data by area, the samples were discriminated, which explained 84% of variance; coffee defects in the samples of ground commercial coffee were separated from high quality coffee and instant coffee. Using the chemical descriptors obtained from the infrared spectra, it was possible to differentiate between high quality, commercial and instant coffee.  

Key words: Coffee bean defects; FTIR-ATR; principal component analysis; quality coffee.

References

BAHAMÓN, A. F.; GUZMÁN, G. N.; PARRADO, L. X. ATR-FTIR for Discrimination of Espresso and Americano

Coffee Pods. Coffee Science, 13(4):550-558, 2018.

BARBIN, D. F. et al. Application of infrared spectral techniques on quality and compositional attributes of

coffee: An overview. Food Research International, 61:23-32, 2014.

BHUMIRATANA, N.; ADHIKARI, K.; CHAMBERS, E. Evolution of sensory aroma attributes from coffee beans

to brewed coffee. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 44(10):2185-2192, 2011.

BUFFO, R. A.; CARDELLI, C. Coffee flavour: An overview. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 19(2):99-104, 2004.

CHARLES, B. M. et al. Interactions between volatile and nonvolatile coffee components. 1. Screening of

nonvolatile components. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(11):4417-4425, 2005.

CHO, A. R. et al. Influence of roasting conditions on the antioxidant characteristics of colombian coffee (Coffea

Arabica L.) beans. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 38(3):271-280, 20114.

CRAIG, A. P. et al. Mid infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics as tools for the classification of roasted

coffees by cup quality. Food Chemistry, 245:1052-1061, 2018.

CRAIG, A. P.; FRANCA, A. S.; OLIVEIRA, L. S. Discrimination between defective and non-defective roasted coffees by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 47(2):505-511, 2012a

CRAIG, A. P.; FRANCA, A. S.; OLIVEIRA, L. S. Evaluation of the potential of FTIR and chemometrics for separation

between defective and non-defective coffees. Food Chemistry, 132(3):1368-1374, 2012b.

CRAIG, A. P.; FRANCA, A. S. OLIVEIRA, L. S. IRUDAYARAJ, J. ILELEJI, K. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and near infrared spectroscopy for the quantification of defects in roasted coffees. Talanta, Netherlands, v.134: p.379-386, 2015.

CREMER, D. R.; KALETUNÇ, G. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic study of the chemical microstructure of corn and oat flour-based extrudates. Carbohydrate Polymers, 52(1):53-65, 2003.

DIAZ, D. R. C. et al. Quantitative assessment of specific defects in roasted ground coffee via infraredphotoacoustic

spectroscopy. Food Chemistry, 255:132-138, 2018.

FARAH, A. Coffee Constituents. In: CHU, Y. F. Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, 352p.

FUJIOKA, K.; SHIBAMOTO, T. Chlorogenic acid and caffeine contents in various commercial brewed coffees.

Food Chemistry, 106(1):217-221, 2008.

GARRIGUES, J. M. et al. Fourier transform infrared determination of caffeine in roasted coffee samples.

Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 366(3):319-322, 2000.

GEEL, L.; KINNEAR, M.; DE KOCK, H. L. Relating consumer preferences to sensory attributes of instant

coffee. Food Quality and Preference, 16(3):237-244, 2005.

GIACALONE, D. et al. Common roasting defects in coffee: Aroma composition, sensory characterization and

consumer perception. Food Quality and Preference, 71:463-474, 2019.

GLOESS, A. N. et al. Comparison of nine common coffee extraction methods: Instrumental and sensory analysis.

European Food Research and Technology, 236(4):607-627, 2013.

HERNÁNDEZ, J. A. et al. Analysis of the heat and mass transfer during coffee batch roasting. Journal of Food

Engineering, 78(4):1141-1148, 2007.

ISO 9001. Quality management system, principles and terminology. 2000.

LYMAN, D. J. et al. FTIR-ATR analysis of brewed coffee: Effect of roasting conditions. Journal of Agricultural

and Food Chemistry, 51(11):3268-3272, 2003.

MAZZAFERA, P. Chemical composition of defective coffee beans. Food Chemistry, 64(4):547-554, 1999.

OLIVEIRA, A. L. et al. Sensory evaluation of black instant coffee beverage with some volatile compounds present in

aromatic oil from roasted coffee. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 29(1):76-80, 2009.

PARADKAR, M. M.; IRUDAYARAJ, J. Rapid determination of caffeine content in soft drinks using FTIR-ATR

spectroscopy. Food Chemistry, 78(2):261-266, 2002.

PICCINO, S. et al. Aromatic composition and potent odorants of the “specialty coffee” brew “Bourbon

Pointu” correlated to its three trade classifications. Food Research International, 61:264-271, 2014.

PUERTA, G. I. Cómo garantizar la buena calidad de la bebida del café y evitar los defectos. Avances técnicos

CENICAFÉ. 2001. Available in: <https://www.cenicafe. org/es/publications/avt0284.pdf>. Access in:: June, 14,

R CORE TEAM. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical

Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>.

REIS, N.; FRANCA, A. S.; OLIVEIRA, L. S. Discrimination between roasted coffee, roasted corn and coffee husks

by Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy. LWT - Food Science and Technology,

(2):715-722, 2013a.

REIS, N.; FRANCA, A. S.; OLIVEIRA, L. S. Performance of diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform

spectroscopy and chemometrics for detection of multiple adulterants in roasted and ground coffee.

LWT - Food Science and Technology, 53(2):395-401,2013b.

RODRIGUEZ, S. L. E.; ALLENDORF, M. E. Use of FTIR for rapid authentication and detection of adulteration of

food. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 2(1):467-483, 2012.

SANCHEZ, K.; CHAMBERS, E. How does product preparation affect sensory properties? An example with

coffee. Journal of Sensory Studies, 30(6):499-511, 2015.

SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION - SCA. Protocols: cupping specialty coffee. Available in:

org/?page=resources&d=cupping-protocols> Access in: June, 02, 2019.

SILVA, A. N. da. et al. Performance of hedonic scales in sensory acceptability of strawberry yogurt. Food Quality

and Preference, 30(1):9-21. 2013.

SILVERSTEIN, R.; WEBSTER, X.; KIEMLE, J. Infrared Spectrometric. In: SILVERTEIN, R.; WEBSTER, X.;KIEMLE, J. Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. 8.ed. United States of America, Wiley, 2005. 466p.

SUNARHARUM, W. B.; WILLIAMS, D. J.; SMYTH, H. E. Complexity of coffee flavor: A compositional and sensory

perspective. Food Research International, 62:315-325, 2014.

TOLEDO, P. R. et al. Relationship between the different aspects related to coffee quality and their volatile

compounds. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(4):705-719, 2016.

VALENCIA, J.; PINZÓN, M.; GUTIÉRREZ, R. Caracterización fisicoquímica y sensorial de tazas de café producidas en el departamento del Quindío. Revista Alimentos Hoy, 23(36):150-156, 2015.

VILLALÓN, N. et al. An 1H NMR-based metabolomic approach to compare the chemical profiling of retail samples of ground roasted and instant coffees. Food Research International, 106:63-270, 2018.

WEI, F.; TANOKURA, M. Chemical Changes in the Components of Coffee Beans during Roasting. In: PREEDY, V. R. (Ed). Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention. Academic Press, 2014, 1080p.

WCR - WORLD COFFEE RESEARCH. Sensory lexicon: Unabridged definition and references. 2017. Available in: <https://worldcoffeeresearch.org/media/documents/20170622_WCR_Sensory_Lexicon_2-0.pdf>. Access in: June, 20, 2019.

ZANIN, R. C. et al. Good cup quality roasted coffees show wide variation in chlorogenic acids content. LWT - Food

Science and Technology, 74:480-483, 2016.

Published

2020-06-17

How to Cite

BARRIOS RODRIGUEZ, Y. F.; SALAS CALDERON, K. T.; GIRON HERNANDEZ, J. Comparison of sensory attributes and chemical markers of the infrared spectrum between defective and non-defective Colombian coffee samples. Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909, v. 15, p. e151659, 17 Jun. 2020.