PHYTOTOXICITY AND GROWTH OF COFFEE PLANTS AS A FUNCTION OF THE APPLICATION OF HERBICIDE 2,4-D
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25186/cs.v14i4.1605Keywords:
Coffea arabica, chemical control, damage, driftAbstract
Weed control in coffee is of great importance for there is a great interference, standing out the competition for water, light and nutrients. Among the control methods, chemical control is highlighted as a function of its efficiency. However, the incorrect application of herbicides may imply the occurrence of drift, resulting in damage to coffee development due to phytotoxicity. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the symptoms and phytotoxicity effects caused by the herbicide 2,4-D drift on the morphological, physiological and anatomical characteristics of coffee seedlings. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with ‘Topázio MG1190’ coffee seedlings (Coffea arabica L.), planted in 11-L pots. A randomized block design with four treatments and four replicates was used. The treatments were: 0%; 10%; 25% and 50% of the recommended commercial dose of 2,4-D (2.5 L.ha-1). Each plot consisted of three plants. The evaluations were performed at 74 days after implantation. Morphological, physiological, anatomical and phytotoxicity symptoms were evaluated as a function of the simulated herbicide drift. Coffee seedlings intoxicated by the herbicide 2,4-D presented hyponastic, chlorosis, shriveling and leaf anomalies. In the orthotropic branch, bending was observed in its extension, besides thickening in the collar region; in the plagiotropic branch, cracking was observed. Herbicide drift negatively affects the development of coffee plants. The coffee physiology was affected as a function of herbicide drift, but without damage to the leaf anatomy.References
BELO A. F., et al. Photosynthetic activity of plants cultivated in soil contaminated with picloram. Planta Daninha, Viçosa, v.29, n.1, p.885–892, 2011.
CASTANHEIRA, D. T., et al. Growth, anatomy and physiology of coffee plants intoxicated by the herbicide glyphosate. Coffee Science, Lavras, v. 14, n. 1, p. 76 - 82, jan./mar. 2019.
CUNHA, J. L. X. L., et al. Comparação de métodos de área foliar em Chrysobalanus icaco L. Agropecuária Científica no Semiárido, Patos, v. 6, n. 3, p. 22-27, jul./set. 2010.
FERREIRA, D. F. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, Lavras, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042, 2011.
FIALHO, C.M.T., et al. Interferência de plantas daninhas sobre o crescimento inicial de Coffea arábica. Planta Daninha, v. 29, n. 1, p. 137-147, 2011.
GROSSMANN, K. Mode of action of auxinic herbicides: a new ending to a long, drawn out story. Trends Plant Sci., v. 5, n. 12, p. 506-8, 2000.
GROSSMANN, K. Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Management Science, v.66, n.2, p.113 120, 2010.
HANSEN, H.; GROSSMANN, K. Auxin-induced ethylene triggers abscisic acid biosynthesis and growth inhibition. Plant Physiology, v. 124, n. 3, p. 1437- 1448, 2000.
JORGE, L. A. C.; SILVA, D. J. C. B. SAFIRA: Manual de utilização. São Carlos: Embrapa CPDIA, 2010. 29p.
LINCOLN C.; et al. A Knotted-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants leaf. Plant Cell, v.6, p.1859-1876, 1994.
LORENZI, H. Manual de Identificação e controle de plantas daninhas. 7ª Ed. Nova Odessa – SP. Instituto Plantarum, 2014. 384p.
MATIELLO, J. B. et al. Cultura de Café no Brasil: manual de recomendações. Rio de Janeiro: MAPA/PROCAFE, 2010. 542 p.
O'BRIEN, T. P.; FEDER, N.; MCCULLY, Mi E. Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma, USA, v. 59, n. 2, p. 368-373, 1964.
OLIVEIRA JR, R. S. de. Introdução ao controle químico. Biologia e Manejo de plantas daninhas, p. 125-140, 2011.
R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statisti- cal computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.R-project.org>. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2016.
RODRIGUES, B. N.; ALMEIDA, F. S. de. Guia de herbicidas. 7. ed. Londrina: Grafmarke, 2018. 697
RONCHI, C.P.; SILVA. A.A. Tolerância de mudas de café a herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência. Planta Daninha, Viçosa-MG, v. 21, n. 3, p.421-426, 2003.
SACHS, T. Integrating cellular and organismic aspects of vascular differentiation. Plant and Cell Physiology, Oxford, v. 41, p. 649-656, 2000.
SEGATTO, F. B.; et al. Técnica para o estudo da anatomia da epiderme foliar de batata. Ciência Rural, v.34, n.5, p.1597-1601, 2004.
SILVA, H., et al. Relationships between leaf anatomy, morphology, and water use efficiency in Aloe vera (L) Burm f. as a function of water availability. Revista chilena de história natural, Santiago, v. 87, n. 1, p. 13, 2014.
SILVA, L. G., et al. Sintomas de fitotoxicidade e crescimento de mudas de café submetidas aos herbicidas inibidores da PROTOX. Coffee Science, Lavras, v.12, n.3, 2017
TAIZ, L.; ZEIGER, E. Fisiologia vegetal. In: Fisiologia vegetal. Artmed, p. 819, 2009.
YAMASHITA, O.M. et al. Influência do glyphosate e 2,4-D sobre o desenvolvimento inicial de espécies florestais. Scientia Forestalis, v.37, n.84, p.359-366, 2009.
YAN, J., et al. High photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency of Miscanthus lutarioriparius characterize an energy crop in the semiarid temperate region. Gcb Bioenergy v. 7, n. 2, p. 207-218, 2015.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados nesta revista pertencem aos autores, com os primeiros direitos de publicação pertencentes à revista. Como os artigos aparecem nesta revista com acesso aberto, eles podem ser usados livremente, com as devidas atribuições, em aplicativos educacionais e não comerciais.
